'Ethnoecology" emerged as that branch of the new ethnography which describes people's conceptual models of their environment. It is distinguished primarily by its subject matter, which includes classifications of plants (Berlin et al. 1974, Friedberg 1979), animals (Blumer 1957, 1967, Kesby 1979), land forms (Conklin 1967), and so on, and shares its methods and underlying premises with the broader field of 'cognitive anthropology' (Tyler 1969) to which it belong.
 |
| Source: https://inamuse.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/peralatan-sehari-hari-suku-wana-di-cagar-alam-morowali-1/ |
The frefix 'ethno-' is used to denote a field of knowledge defined from the viewpoint of the people being studied (Fowler 1977:216) and is similar in meaning to the term 'folk' (as in 'folk knowledge', 'folk model', 'folk medicine'). Thus, ethnoecology is a branch of 'ethnomedicine', 'ethnobiology' and so on. The use of the frefix 'ethno-' is essentially 'ethnocentric'; it impies that those bodies of knowledge not labelled 'ethno-', usually those generated by academic study in the 'western' tradition, are somehow privileged: 'Scientific knowledge, as we conceive it, has cross-cultural validity; ethnoscience, on the other hand, refers to knowledeg that is indigeneous to a particular language an culture' (Glick 1964:273).